Article Highlights
Cubic Transportation Systems said it had a lower bid price than Indra for Transport for London’s revenue-collection contract. But Cubic contends in its lawsuit against TfL that it was treated unfairly in the procurement evaluation, and its tender was thrown out. The vendor also alleges a potential conflict of interest by rival Indra.
• Document: Particulars of claim filed by Cubic with Court of Justice in London, Aug. 2025
• TfL (London)
• Cubic
• Indra
• Rebel Group
• NTA (Ireland)
Cubic Transportation Systems contends that it submitted a lower bid than rival Indra Systems for Transport for London’s revenue-collection contract and says it should have won the contract but alleges it was treated unfairly in the competition for the lucrative deal.
Cubic made the claims in its lawsuit against TfL seeking to overturn the agency’s decision in July to award the contract to Indra. Among the problems that Cubic’s lawyers spotlighted in their particulars of claim filing for the suit was the fact that two former TfL employees work for consulting firm Rebel Group, which advised Indra on its bid–raising the potential for a conflict of interest. (Download the particulars of claim, which lays out Cubic’s legal case, below.)
Subscription Required
This premium content is only available to subscribers
Article has about1488words.
To keep reading, subscribe today
Get access to premium content from the only global publication devoted exclusively to mobility payments by subscribing today to the most authoritative source for news and analysis in the industry.
